top of page
Ubd Page 2.png
Screenshot 2024-10-06 9.10.26 PM.png
UbD Page 4.png

Fink's 3 Column  vs  UbD

Fink 3 Column Table 

  • List learning goals for the course

  •  Identify how to assess student learning for each goal

  • Identify what students need to do to learn for each goal and what instructors need to teach

  • User friendly 

  • Begins with BHAG

Similarities 

  • Clear learning objectives

  •  Teacher is the facilitator 

  • Promotes student inquiry

  • Steer away from "traditional " teaching methadology

Understanding by Design

  • Based on "backward design" 

  •  Desired results

  • Evidence

  • Learning Plan

  • Broad and more complex 

Understanding by Design & 3-Column Table Reflection

I have been exploring the Understanding by Design (UbD) Template and Fink's 3-Column Table, both crucial curriculum design models. Each has its own approach to creating learning experiences for all learners.

Fink's model consists of Learning Goals, Feedback and Assessment, and Teaching and Learning Activities. It is based on Significant Learning Experiences and is known for its simplicity and ease of use. The 3 Column Table is used in the ADL program and is frequently referenced in the course assignments. It emphasizes the importance of aligning tasks and tests with the overall learning goals. Fink's Model of Significant Learning focuses on guiding the learning goals and includes elements such as basic knowledge, application, integration, the human factor, caring, and learning how to learn. This model effectively promotes deep learning and ensures students develop a broad range of values and skills rather than just memorizing facts.

​

The UbD structure is based on "backward design" and consists of three parts: Desired Results, Evidence, and Learning Plan. Educators start by determining what they want to achieve, considering the evidence needed to demonstrate student learning, and planning tasks to support student learning. The UbD Template encourages teachers to focus on the key concepts they want students to grasp and build lessons around essential questions that prompt students to ask more questions and gain a deeper understanding. It also emphasizes the idea of transfer, enabling students to apply their learning in new and various situations.

 

Fink's model is more user-friendly than the UbD templates. This can be especially helpful for quickly creating course outlines while highlighting essential learning objectives. The UbD Template covers a broad range with the three-step process and may be more fitting for creating complex units or specialized classes.

Fink's method has prepared me for the importance of integrating different types of learning to enhance the overall learning experience. Meanwhile, UbD has deepened my understanding of aligning curriculum design to ensure that every aspect of my teaching meets the established learning goals. Fink's 3-Column Table has driven me to contemplate how learning experiences impact students in areas beyond academic content. Innovating, engaging, and high-impact lessons are not exclusively about efficiency or technology but also how people learn. I can improve my innovation plan by incorporating ideas from Fink's and UbD's models into my teaching. My plan will be well-organized with clear objectives and applicable, engaging, and helpful in real-life educational settings, which is the core of authentic educational progress.

​

 

References

​

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences : an integrated approach to designing college               courses. Jossey-Bass.

​

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and                      Curriculum Development.

bottom of page